Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:03:50 12/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2003 at 14:14:03, Slater Wold wrote: >There is a lot of talk that the HW experiment(s) Peter & I have run are no good, >because the commercial is getting 'crappy' hardware. That a Celeron vs a P4 is >not the same as a 2x2.8Ghz vs a 4x2.0Ghz Opteron. > >I don't want to get into this discussion. I just want to see who is right. ;) > >Here is what I propose: > >Crafty = Crafty 19.8 on a P4 3.0Ghz with 8h/G. >Shredder = Shredder 7.04 on a P4 2.0Ghz with 2h/G. My advice is to run crafty on both machines, and compare the NPS. Then play with shredder at 2h/G and crafty at the appropriate multiplier to achieve the time advantage you are trying to test. IE if you want to do an opteron comparison, I could give you a bench run to give an NPS value for the quad 2.0ghz opteron I was running on... You could use that to scale the Piv/3 to that speed if that is the point here... However, I am not quite sure what you are trying to show? IE I have run on an 8-cpu opteron and know what it looks like speed-wise as well. I've not run on any opteron beyond 8-way yet... > >The games will be played on ICC. > >Bob, feel free to send me learning files, books, special instructions, whatever. > This will be just like a championship. I would use the same books on the ftp. Re-grab the to clear any learning if you have run any with learning enabled. Then run both engines with learning enabled... let 'er rip... > >Same with you Sandro.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.