Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Conclusion(Amir Ban,Christophe Theron please respond)

Author: Miguel A. Ballicora

Date: 12:31:55 12/30/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 30, 2003 at 15:20:34, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>
>>But tournaments where people are allowed to use any hardware they can find
>>(non-uniform platform tournaments) are a pure nonsense.
>>
>
>I completely agree with this. What is the point of program X running on a 2.4
>GHz machine against program Y which is running on a Quad? Does the result show
>that program Y has better eval? better search? Nothing. It just shows that

The point is to find the winner of the combination hardware+software.
In other words, the top chess machine. It is not a software competition.

>program Y can run over its opponent like a freight train. I think WMCCC events
>will be more interesting and more meaningful from a scientific point of view.

If there is science in building algorithms, there is some science in building
hardware for chess too.

Anyway, I will leave the word science out because any of these tournaments are
more about sport. The important thing is the competition.

Miguel



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.