Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 00:59:04 12/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 2003 at 14:59:53, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On December 30, 2003 at 02:24:50, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>[...] >> >>It is better to have a bug, but a stronger program, then no bugs, >>but a weak program! >> >>Sandro Hi Eugene, > >*If* you are interested in a result (win, draw, or loss), and not in a beautiful >game, than probably it's better to have a consistently playing and well-debugged >program than one that usually plays better but regularly blunders. Sorry, but you missed something: 1) the bug we had did not came out in hundreds of games. 2) we only had one bug which has been removed later. 3) I am interested only in WINNING all games and KILLING the opponents everytime! I get upset when we do not! I must add that I want to congratulate with you about the endgames tables which I find fantastic! I wish you a wonderful 2004! Ciao, Sandro > >Thanks, >Eugene
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.