Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 02:45:26 12/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 2003 at 22:50:24, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On December 30, 2003 at 18:34:14, Andrew Williams wrote: > >Ugh. > >I learned to first ugh, run diep then comment how good or bad it is. Nice to >know you announce your mate in dutch by the way! > >to honour you i did it in english! > >00:00 35500 355 0 (1) 1 (0,0) 0.259 Rf7xe7 Qd8xe7 Bb5xd7 Ke8-d8 >00:00 41700 417 0 (1) 1 (0,0) 0.260 Rf1-f2 >00:00 62100 621 0 (1) 1 (0,0) 3.694 Rf1-e1 >00:00 75700 2271 0 (1) 2 (0,1) 7.636 Rf1-e1 Qd8-b6 Qe6xb6 a7xb6 Re1xe7 Ke8-d8 R >e7xd7 Kd8-c8 Bb5xd3 Ra8xa2 Rf7xg7 Ra2xb2 Rg7xh7 >00:00 111783 6707 0 (1) 3 (0,2) 7.636 Rf1-e1 Qd8-b6 Qe6xb6 a7xb6 Re1xe7 Ke8-d8 R >e7xd7 Kd8-c8 Bb5xd3 Ra8xa2 Rf7xg7 Ra2xb2 Rg7xh7 >00:00 105188 9467 0 (1) 4 (0,3) 7.636 Rf1-e1 Qd8-b6 Qe6xb6 a7xb6 Re1xe7 Ke8-d8 R >e7xd7 Kd8-c8 Bb5xd3 Ra8xa2 Rf7xg7 Ra2xb2 Rg7xh7 >00:00 122275 19564 0 (1) 5 (0,4) 7.636 Rf1-e1 Qd8-b6 Qe6xb6 a7xb6 Re1xe7 Ke8-d8 >Re7xd7 Kd8-c8 Bb5xd3 Ra8xa2 Rf7xg7 Ra2xb2 Rg7xh7 >00:00 114372 99504 0 (1) 6 (0,5) 7.636 Rf1-e1 Qd8-b6 Qe6xb6 a7xb6 Re1xe7 Ke8-d8 >Re7xd7 Kd8-c8 Bb5xd3 Ra8xa2 Rf7xg7 Ra2xb2 Rg7xh7 >00:02 113743 250235 0 (1) 7 (0,6) 8.753 Rf1-e1 Qd8-b6 Qe6xb6 a7xb6 Re1xe7 Ke8-d8 > Re7xd7 Kd8-c8 Rd7-c7 Kc8-b8 Rc7xb7 Kb8-c8 Bb5xd3 Ra8xa2 Rf7-c7 Kc8-d8 Rc7xg7 >++ g1-h1 procnr=0 terug=8810 org=[8753;8754] newwindow=[8753;520000] >00:06 131164 821091 0 (1) 7 (0,6) MATE04 Kg1-h1 h7-h6 Rf1-e1 Ra8-c8 Rf7xe7 Qd8xe >7 Qe6xe7 > >Bummer 7 ply. > >So perhaps dual it goes faster. > >So now the 512 cpu: >time nps score >[snip] >05:00 10,023,453 Mate in 220 0 (512) 64 (0,2) MAT220 d2-d4 d7-d5 c2-c4 c7-c6 >e4xd5 c6xd5 > >No sorry that was the openings position! Oh, great! Diep has solved chess game:) Make it commercial now for 1000$ ! But really when you will make available Diep, to the public?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.