Author: Les Fernandez
Date: 15:31:41 12/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2003 at 12:29:38, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On December 31, 2003 at 03:59:04, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On December 30, 2003 at 14:59:53, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >> >>>On December 30, 2003 at 02:24:50, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>[...] >>>> >>>>It is better to have a bug, but a stronger program, then no bugs, >>>>but a weak program! >>>> >>>>Sandro >> >>Hi Eugene, >>> >>>*If* you are interested in a result (win, draw, or loss), and not in a beautiful >>>game, than probably it's better to have a consistently playing and well-debugged >>>program than one that usually plays better but regularly blunders. >> >>Sorry, but you missed something: >> >>1) the bug we had did not came out in hundreds of games. >>2) we only had one bug which has been removed later. > >Yes, and according to the *written* rules of the tournament that bug should cost >you half a point in the *critical* game -- and world title with that half a >point. > >Happy New Year, too. > >Thanks, >Eugene > >>3) I am interested only in WINNING all games and KILLING the opponents >>everytime! I get upset when we do not! >> >>I must add that I want to congratulate with you about the endgames tables which >>I find fantastic! >> >>I wish you a wonderful 2004! >> >>Ciao, >> >>Sandro >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Eugene Hi Eugene, Great work as usual! How much more time before you send the next big set of 6 piece pawn sets to Bob?? Wouldn't Bob just be tickled <S> Happy New Year!!! Les
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.