Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:26:12 12/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2003 at 18:31:41, Les Fernandez wrote: >On December 31, 2003 at 12:29:38, Eugene Nalimov wrote: > >>On December 31, 2003 at 03:59:04, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>On December 30, 2003 at 14:59:53, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >>> >>>>On December 30, 2003 at 02:24:50, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>>> >>>>>[...] >>>>> >>>>>It is better to have a bug, but a stronger program, then no bugs, >>>>>but a weak program! >>>>> >>>>>Sandro >>> >>>Hi Eugene, >>>> >>>>*If* you are interested in a result (win, draw, or loss), and not in a beautiful >>>>game, than probably it's better to have a consistently playing and well-debugged >>>>program than one that usually plays better but regularly blunders. >>> >>>Sorry, but you missed something: >>> >>>1) the bug we had did not came out in hundreds of games. >>>2) we only had one bug which has been removed later. >> >>Yes, and according to the *written* rules of the tournament that bug should cost >>you half a point in the *critical* game -- and world title with that half a >>point. >> >>Happy New Year, too. >> >>Thanks, >>Eugene >> >>>3) I am interested only in WINNING all games and KILLING the opponents >>>everytime! I get upset when we do not! >>> >>>I must add that I want to congratulate with you about the endgames tables which >>>I find fantastic! >>> >>>I wish you a wonderful 2004! >>> >>>Ciao, >>> >>>Sandro >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Eugene > >Hi Eugene, > >Great work as usual! How much more time before you send the next big set of 6 >piece pawn sets to Bob?? Wouldn't Bob just be tickled <S> > >Happy New Year!!! > >Les I believe he is up to 150gigs+ on the next installment. So I assume it is "getting close"...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.