Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Ever be a new program which could rightly be called staggering?

Author: Sally Weltrop

Date: 20:22:12 12/31/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 31, 2003 at 21:09:46, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On December 31, 2003 at 19:21:35, Ed Trice wrote:
>
>>Think about what a 2900 rating signifies: basically, you could spank a mere 2500
>>rated player indefinitely, never incurring a loss yourself.
>>
>>As it would play against 2600 or 2700 caliber players, losses would occur.
>>Against 2800 rated opponents (pretty tough to find) a 2900 program would still
>>finish ahead at the end of a long match.
>>
>>Before a program could make an honest claim at being 2900, I think the team
>>would have to scrape up some money and get Gary Kasparov to play a 40 game match
>>with it. The terms would have to be steep to get the most out of Gary, such as
>>is he loses he could only play checkers from now on, and if he wins he gets to
>>have Pamela Anderson for a year plus about $20 million in spending money.
>
>
>
>Pamela Anderson!?...
>
>Is it supposed to be some kind of reward?! Yuk! I'd better suck silicon (mmh...
>maybe that's what you meant?).
>
>Hint: happy new year to Neferteri Sheperd
>(http://playmates.chrisos.com/Neferteri_Sheperd/Sea/).
>
>(...don't try this at home)
>
>
>
>    Christophe (3rd glass of Champagne, I know that's not an excuse...)

going on my 5th beer, cheers!
>
>
>
>



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.