Author: Mark Young
Date: 08:41:06 01/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2004 at 11:25:09, Andre van Ark wrote: >On January 01, 2004 at 11:06:15, Mark Young wrote: > >>On January 01, 2004 at 10:46:33, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>On January 01, 2004 at 09:42:45, Luis Smith wrote: >>> >>>>>YAPOFF! >>>>>Yet another ponder off match! >>>>>regards >>>>>Bernhard >>>> >>>>I think ponder=off shows mostly the same results as ponder=off games. Have a >>>>look at Volker's experiment http://www.pittlik.de/winboard.html >>>> >>>>Click on "Ponder Experiment" >>> >>>I agree. >>> >>>In germany test CSS (Klaus Wlotzka) for the CSS Rating List , Ponder "OFF" >>too!! >> >>Yes, I also agree. I test with one and two computer with ponder on and off. The >>results are almost the same within the statistical margin of error. >> >>I have seen programmers on CCC claim bad results do to testing with ponder off >>some years ago. I tested this claim, which I found to say nicely NOT TRUE. >> >>I have yet to see a program that plays worse, or better statistically speaking >>with ponder on or off. > >Junior. Please post your junior games with ponder on and off please. I don't find this to be true in any version of junior I have tested.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.