Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Ruffian 2.0.0 strength - another results

Author: Bernhard Bauer

Date: 08:56:58 01/01/04

Go up one level in this thread

On January 01, 2004 at 10:50:25, Eduard Nemeth wrote:

>On January 01, 2004 at 07:50:44, Volker Richey wrote:
>
>>Ponder off and the weaker engine smiles ;)
>
>Klaus Wlotzka tested for the German CSS (Computerschach - und Spiele,
>Computerchess Magazine) Rating List, with Ponder = OFF too.
>See it on his Homepage.

So I suggest using PonderOff for the WCCC, because poff leads to the same
results as many "experts" have proven. Another suggestion could be using shorter
time controls. This way the WCCC could be finished in one day.
Many "experts" have proven that shorter time controls lead to the same results
as long time controls.
kind regards
Bernhard

• Re: Ruffian 2.0.0 strength - another results Luis Smith 09:32:00 01/01/04
  • Re: Ruffian 2.0.0 strength - another results Robert Hyatt 11:56:22 01/01/04
    • Re: Ruffian 2.0.0 strength - another results Luis Smith 12:15:16 01/01/04
      • Re: Ruffian 2.0.0 strength - another results Robert Hyatt 13:07:33 01/01/04
        • Re: Ruffian 2.0.0 strength - another results Ulrich Tuerke 08:12:13 01/02/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.