Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 10:29:58 01/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2004 at 12:51:17, Milorad Madjar wrote:
>MD 3200 +
>256 DDR, 64 for all
>ponder off
>tablebase off
>remis.ctg
>Fritz8 GUI
>10 min gam
>78 games
>
>21-2 s 2003
>
> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3
>1 Shredder 7.04 * ½ 1 1 1 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 1 1 1 10.5/12
>2 Hiarcs 9 ½ * 0 1 1 1 1 0 ½ 1 0 1 1 8.0/12
>3 Ktulu 4.2 0 1 * ½ ½ 1 0 1 1 ½ ½ 1 ½ 7.5/12
>4 Chess Tiger 15.0 0 0 ½ * 1 ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 0 0 6.5/12 37.50
>5 Crafty 19.06 0 0 ½ 0 * ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 6.5/12 32.75
>6 Junior 8 0 0 0 ½ ½ * 0 1 ½ 1 1 1 1 6.5/12 30.25
>7 The King 3.23M2v.5 ½ 0 1 0 0 1 * 0 ½ 1 0 1 1 6.0/12
>8 CM9000 Mapi 0 1 0 0 ½ 0 1 * 1 0 ½ 1 ½ 5.5/12 29.50
>9 Fritz 8 ½ ½ 0 0 0 ½ ½ 0 * 1 ½ 1 1 5.5/12 28.75
>10 SmarThink 0.17 0 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 0 1 0 * 1 ½ 1 5.0/12
>11 CM9 Gladiator 0 1 ½ 0 0 0 1 ½ ½ 0 * 0 1 4.5/12
>12 Kaissa 1.7 0 0 0 1 ½ 0 0 0 0 ½ 1 * 0 3.0/12 16.75
>13 Ufim 4.03 0 0 ½ 1 0 0 0 ½ 0 0 0 1 * 3.0/12 16.00
Interesting to see the bad result of CM9_Gladiation which
is being tested by us at 15m+10s with even worse results.
Indeed very strange in view of the top result of Sedat
Canbaz.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.