Author: Matthew McKnight
Date: 08:45:57 01/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2004 at 11:24:19, Steven J. Brann wrote: >On January 02, 2004 at 11:05:41, Anthony Cozzie wrote: > >>On January 02, 2004 at 09:57:38, Jasmine Baer wrote: >> >>>I've seen it written that under the following conditions: >>> >>>1. Engine vs. Engine match or tournament >>>2. Held on a single computer with a single processor >>> >>>having ponder=ON(or Permanent Brain in the Fritz GUI) will impact the play of >>>the engines since the each individual engine would not have full access to the >>>processor during its own turn. >>> >>>First, is this true? >>> >>>Second, is this issue, if it actually is an issue, something that is eliminated >>>by running a two-processor system? >>> >>>And, finally, does anyone have any solid insight on how ponder=off/on or >>>Permanent Brain works on a Pentium 4 with Hyperthreading? >>> >>>Thanks. >> >>Ponder means that the engine thinks while its opponent moves. Since there is >>only 1 cpu, and both engines are thinking, they get half the cpu. >> >>HT is garbage for computer chess. A pentium 4 is ONE core. HT is designed for >>applications that spend most of their time in the memory system. >> >>anthony > >To me, my 3.0G HT machine is NOT garbage for computer chess. When it is >thinking about a position it takes up 50% of the CPU and is still much much >faster than my 1.9G P4 machine. When analyzing a position with my 1.9G P4, the >machine would be rendered useless for using any other application while it was >thinking about a position. > >So, HT enables me to accomplish other things on the machine at the same time ... >email, reviewing this site, chat with video, Word, Excel ... and >performance-wise its as if the chess program isn't running at all. I'm >analyzing a position as I write this. Yes this is what HT does, but it's also what every other modern CPU does... It's just Intel's latest buzzword for a well-known technology called pipelining. I believe what the author meant by the word "garbage" is simply that you shouldn't believe you _need_ a machine with HT for computer chess. Interestingly enough, pipelining benefits from you running more than one program at a time. That is to say that if you were to run two processes, each using 50% of the cpu for 1 hour, they would get more work done than the sum of work done from both processes individually at 100% for one hour each. The increased difference between the types of programs in the experiment, increases the results. This is a product of the enormous clock rate!! The only way to get such a speed is to try and run instructions simultaneously, and this is why you do better when you run two completely different programs (i.e. working on different things). Personally, I would love to have a PIV 3.0ghz HT regardless of HT's significance, that machine is smokin. > >That means a lot to ME. Certainly not garbage in my opinion. > >Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.