Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 11:11:41 01/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2004 at 02:14:48, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 01, 2004 at 20:48:58, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: > >>Hi Christian, >> >>thanks for the game. Very reminiscent of the XiniX game in Leiden when Ruffian >>was completely unaware of the goings-on on the king's side. Again the same >>pattern of being oblivious of king safety. Something that Per-Ola has already >>been working on. Bxg3 is simply a suicidal move, opening up the h-file for the >>rook and queen, not to mention the very dangerous g3 mobile pawn. > >I am not sure what is the losing move. >As a human I also do not like Bxg3 but it is about tactics and the question is >if black has a better defence later. > >After 12...Qb6 yace can learn a big advantage for white. > >I think that 12...Qb6 is bad also for positional reasons(black should do >something to protect the king and not to try to capture pawns in the queen side. > >Uri I belive that 9...e5!? was very stronger than 0-0. here: [Event "40/60"] [Site "privat"] [Date "2004.01.02"] [Round "?"] [White "Ktulu 4.2"] [Black "Ruffian 2.0.0"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "D02"] [Annotator "Nemeth,Eduard"] [PlyCount "39"] [TimeControl "300"] 1. Nf3 d5 2. d4 e6 3. Bf4 Nf6 4. e3 c5 5. c3 Nc6 6. Nbd2 Bd6 7. Bg3 cxd4 8. exd4 Bxg3 9. hxg3 O-O (9... e5 10. dxe5 Ng4 11. Qe2 Qb6 12. Nb3 O-O) 10. Bd3 a5 11. g4 g6 12. Ne5 Qb6 13. Qf3 Nxe5 14. dxe5 Nxg4 15. Qxg4 Qxb2 16. Qh4 h5 17. Qg5 Qxc3 18. Bxg6 f6 19. Bh7+ Kf7 20. Qxf6+ 1-0 A possible variation: 9... e5 10. dxe5 Ng4 11. Qe2 Qb6 12. Nb3 O-O += Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.