Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Test position?!

Author: George Tsavdaris

Date: 14:48:11 01/02/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 02, 2004 at 17:31:38, Dan Andersson wrote:

> This is from a lighting game I played recently. Having worked my ass off during
>the holliday season I was looking for beauty. Resulting in some horrible games
>also.
>[D]r5k1/3b2b1/1qn4p/p1p1pr1P/Pp1pN2p/1P1P4/2PB2BK/1R1Q1R2 w - - 0 29
>Here I rattled away 29. Qg4 offering a double rook sacrifice more or less based
>solely on the weakness of the white squares. Any engine agree that it is
>playable? There are obviously other moves here 29. Bxh6 for example. But I did
>not want to rid black of the spare pawn on g7.
>
>MvH Dan Andersson

Did you really played 29.Qg4 ?  Wow! I would not dare to do it.

After the forced 29...Rxf1 30.Qxd7 there is only 30...Rf7 with unclear result.
If 30...Rxb1?? then black loses after Nf6+.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.