Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:26:47 01/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2004 at 00:18:56, Federico Corigliano wrote: >Yes, it's very similar because today while I was looking Crafty SE source, I >found in hash.c the hash structure of Crafty. As I have the same elements I was >motivated to include all the things in a 64 bit integer. Sucessfull I do it, but >I had to reduce the ply number from 100 to 16, max depth was reduced to 63 >(before was 100) and also I incremented the max score number from -10000..10000 >to the actual one. My "real" current structure used also 16 bytes for the hash >entry, but I had to increment move to 32 bits, and again I have a 24 bytes hash >entry. > >A question, is better 16 bytes for a hash entry that 24? > >Federico Yes. it gives you 3/2 as many entries as 24 bytes. IE a table with 48 bytes holds 3 16-byte entries, or 2 24-byte entries.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.