Author: William Rex
Date: 11:33:19 01/03/04
This tournament was run at 1 min + 3 seconds. The position used was Nunn2.
Some engines showed good play, but Ruffian 2.0.0 was dissapointing. It came in
last by far, not even close to the top commercial engines from chessbase. Is
this because ruffian is not so good at blitz? I'm not sure anyone have input on
this? These were the engines that were included..
Ruffian 2.0.0
Shredder 7.04
Junior 8
Hiarcs 9
Fritz 8.0.0.23
Games were played at 1 min + 3 seconds - nunn2 position
Here are the results
1 2 3 4 5
1 Fritz 8 | *** 11.5-8.5 10.5-9.5 11.0-9.0 12.5-7.5
2 Hiarcs 9 |8.5-11.5 *** 11.0-9.0 10.5-9.5 15.5-4.5
3 Junior 8 |9.5-10.5 9.0-11.0 *** 12.0-8.0 10.5-9.5
4 Shredder 7.04|9.0-11.0 9.5-10.5 8.0-12.0 *** 13.5-6.5
5 Ruffian 2.0.0|7.5-12.5 4.5-15.5 9.5-10.5 6.5-13.5 ***
1 Fritz 8 - 45.5 / 80 - 56.8% (1743.75)
2 Hiarcs 9 - 45.5 / 80 - 56.8% (1691.75)
3 Junior 8 - 41.0 / 80 - 51.2%
4 Shredder 7.04 - 40.0 / 80 - 50.0%
5 Ruffian 2.0.0 - 28.0 / 80 - 35.0%
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.