Author: David Dahlem
Date: 11:59:00 01/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2004 at 14:33:19, William Rex wrote: >This tournament was run at 1 min + 3 seconds. The position used was Nunn2. >Some engines showed good play, but Ruffian 2.0.0 was dissapointing. It came in >last by far, not even close to the top commercial engines from chessbase. Is >this because ruffian is not so good at blitz? I'm not sure anyone have input on >this? These were the engines that were included.. > >Ruffian 2.0.0 >Shredder 7.04 >Junior 8 >Hiarcs 9 >Fritz 8.0.0.23 > >Games were played at 1 min + 3 seconds - nunn2 position > >Here are the results > > 1 2 3 4 5 >1 Fritz 8 | *** 11.5-8.5 10.5-9.5 11.0-9.0 12.5-7.5 >2 Hiarcs 9 |8.5-11.5 *** 11.0-9.0 10.5-9.5 15.5-4.5 >3 Junior 8 |9.5-10.5 9.0-11.0 *** 12.0-8.0 10.5-9.5 >4 Shredder 7.04|9.0-11.0 9.5-10.5 8.0-12.0 *** 13.5-6.5 >5 Ruffian 2.0.0|7.5-12.5 4.5-15.5 9.5-10.5 6.5-13.5 *** > >1 Fritz 8 - 45.5 / 80 - 56.8% (1743.75) >2 Hiarcs 9 - 45.5 / 80 - 56.8% (1691.75) >3 Junior 8 - 41.0 / 80 - 51.2% >4 Shredder 7.04 - 40.0 / 80 - 50.0% >5 Ruffian 2.0.0 - 28.0 / 80 - 35.0% I think the problem is the unreasonable time control. Try a more reasonable time control. Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.