Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:57:11 01/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2004 at 12:28:18, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On December 31, 2003 at 03:35:57, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 31, 2003 at 03:11:07, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>I disagree (NT) >> >>You will clearly earn money from releasing a free version that is stronger than >>Crafty. >> >>If you do not do it and you do not try to prove that your program is at least >>better than Crafty by participating in tournaments like WBEC then the >>conclusion of most readers is that Diep is probably still weaker than Crafty. >> >>Uri > >Diep tends to finish in a reasonable position, albeit under the commercials, at >real tournaments. If the conclusion of most readers is that Diep is probably >still weaker than Crafty, then they're not reading between the lines. > >I'm not saying that your idea is bad, though. > >Dave The only reading between the lines _I_ have done simply suggests "Diep is not a lot _better_ than Crafty." That conclusion is pretty sound. Contrary to what the author claims... I'm perfectly happy with _my_ chances in such a match. When I get to control my side of the equation, anyway. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.