Author: m.d.hurd
Date: 19:02:14 01/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2004 at 20:54:27, William Rex wrote: >,i - Ruffian 2.0.0 >8/PR3p2/1K2pk2/8/6p1/1B2n3/8/r7 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Shredder 7.04: > >2.a8Q Rxa8 > -+ (-4.91) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >2.a8Q Rxa8 > -+ (-4.91) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >2.a8R Rxa8 > -+ (-4.31) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >2.a8R Rxa8 > -+ (-3.92) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >2.a8R Rxa8 > -+ (-3.20) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >2.Rb8 > -+ (-1.67) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 >2.Rb8 > -+ (-1.67) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 >2.Rb8 Ke7 > µ (-1.38) Depth: 2/7 00:00:00 >2.Rb8 Ng2 > = (-0.16) Depth: 2/7 00:00:00 >2.Rb8 Ng2 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 > +- (1.62) Depth: 2/7 00:00:00 >2.Rb8 Rxa7 3.Kxa7 > = (0.08) Depth: 3/4 00:00:00 >2.Rb8 Rxa7 3.Kxa7 > = (0.00) Depth: 3/7 00:00:00 >2.Rb8 Rxa7 3.Kxa7 g3 > = (-0.21) Depth: 4/15 00:00:00 >2.Rb8 Nd5+ 3.Bxd5 Rxa7 4.Kxa7 exd5 > = (-0.21) Depth: 5/12 00:00:00 >2.Rb8 Ke5 3.Kc7 Rxa7+ 4.Rb7 Rxb7+ 5.Kc6 Rxb3 > ³ (-0.46) Depth: 6/14 00:00:00 >2.Rb8 Ke5 3.a8Q Nd5+ 4.Bxd5 Ra6+ 5.Kxa6 > ³ (-0.46) Depth: 6/14 00:00:00 >2.Rb8 Ke5 3.a8Q Nd5+ 4.Bxd5 Rb1+ 5.Ka6 Rb6+ 6.Kxb6 > = (-0.21) Depth: 7/15 00:00:00 29kN >2.Rb8 Ke5 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 f5 5.Rg8 > = (-0.04) Depth: 7/17 00:00:00 37kN >2.Rb8 Ke5 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 f5 5.Ra5+ Kf6 6.Ra1 > = (0.04) Depth: 8/17 00:00:00 63kN, tb=10 >2.Rb8 Ke5 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 f5 5.Ra2 g3 6.Ra1 > = (-0.21) Depth: 9/17 00:00:00 84kN, tb=13 >2.Rb8 Ke5 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 f5 5.Ra1 f4 6.Kc5 > ³ (-0.52) Depth: 9/19 00:00:00 121kN, tb=20 >2.Rb8 Ke5 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 f5 5.Rg8 f4 6.Kc5 f3 > ³ (-0.37) Depth: 10/19 00:00:01 226kN, tb=54 >2.Rb8 Ke5 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 f5 5.Ra1 Kd4 > = (-0.12) Depth: 11/19 00:00:02 362kN, tb=106 >2.Rb8 Ke5 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 f5 5.Ra1 f4 6.Kc5 Ke4 7.Bxe6 > = (-0.04) Depth: 11/21 00:00:02 455kN, tb=171 >2.Rb8 Ke5 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 f5 5.Kc5 f4 6.Re8 g3 7.Rg8 Kf5 > = (-0.16) Depth: 12/21 00:00:04 675kN, tb=348 >2.Rb8 g3 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 g2 5.Rg8 Kf5 6.Rg7 Ng4 7.Bc2+ Kf4 8.Rxf7+ Ke3 9.Rf1 >gxf1Q > ³ (-0.41) Depth: 13/26 00:00:07 1255kN, tb=608 >2.Rb8 g3 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 g2 5.Rg8 Kf5 6.Bc2+ Kf4 7.Bd1 Nxd1 8.Rxg2 > ³ (-0.64) Depth: 13/28 00:00:08 1669kN, tb=702 >2.Rb8 g3 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 g2 5.Rg8 Kf5 6.Bd1 Nxd1 7.Rxg2 f6 8.Kc5 > ³ (-0.67) Depth: 14/30 00:00:22 4205kN, tb=1932 >2.Rb8 g3 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 g2 5.Rg8 Kf5 6.Bd1 Nxd1 7.Rxg2 f6 8.Kc5 > µ (-0.75) Depth: 15/31 00:00:37 7028kN, tb=3632 >2.Rb8 g3 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 g2 5.Rg8 Kf5 6.Bd1 Kf4 7.Kc5 f5 8.Kc6 Nxd1 > µ (-1.00) Depth: 16/34 00:01:07 12475kN, tb=7175 >2.Rb8 g3 3.a8Q Rxa8 4.Rxa8 g2 5.Rg8 Kf5 6.Bd1 Kf4 7.Kb5 f5 8.Rxg2 Nxg2 9.Kb6 > µ (-1.09) Depth: 16/35 00:01:19 15616kN, tb=8757 > >(, none 03.01.2004) > > >On January 03, 2004 at 16:44:39, F. Jermann wrote: > >>The following position occured in a game played yesterday by me against an ELO >>2300 player. After almost 5 hours of fight, the move Kb6 was the last bad >>move... >> >>Interestingly many engines have 'problems' to see the winning move g4! whereas >>others find it almost immediately. Maybe a good test for 'pushed pawn' code?! >> >>[d] 8/PR3p2/1K2pk2/6p1/8/1B2n3/8/r7 b - - 2 53 bm g4;black wins! >> >>Best, >>Frank Hello Frank what hardware are you using ? S7.04 on my amd 2400xp finds it fairly quick. New game 8/PR3p2/1K2pk2/6p1/8/1B2n3/8/r7 b - - 0 1 Analysis by Shredder 7.04: 53...g4 54.Rb8 g3 55.a8Q Rxa8 56.Rxa8 g2 57.Rg8 Kf5 58.Bc2+ Kf4 59.Bd1 Nxd1 60.Rxg2 ³ (-0.67) Depth: 14/31 00:00:22 6675kN, tb=6193 (Hurd, n/a 04.01.2004) Regards Mike
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.