Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:47:42 01/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2004 at 20:53:39, Rick Rice wrote: >Person A posts a message saying Ruffian 2.0 is very dissapointing, with the >results to back it up. This is followed by a second post which basically says >that Ruffian 2.0 rocks with some results to back it up. Are these programs >really so time and hardware sensitive, so as to show varying results on >different CPUs/time controls? > >Ideal solution would be for SSDF to have one massive board with one CPU and >memory for each program (equal CPU and mem for all the progs on its list) and >some way to automate the play of these programs against each other..... on >different time controls such as regular, blitz etc. Just wishful thinking for >the future, but it would eliminate the multiple and varying results. > >Cheers, >Rick You can flip a coin 10 times and get 7 heads and say "this coin produces more heads than tails." Give it to someone else and you might get 7 tails. You have to run a _lot_ of tests before you conclude something...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.