Author: Dieter Buerssner

Date: 04:55:26 01/05/04

Go up one level in this thread

On January 05, 2004 at 04:56:23, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >I tried with all different alternatives - your original formula, the one with >parentheses added and also with W^2. In either case, the calculated number does >not seem to make sense. Oops, sorry. The above should not have been in my post. I first miscalculated the numbers. They did make sense, after I calculated again (while writing the post). Regards, Dieter

- Re: A question about statistics...
**Peter Fendrich***15:11:25 01/05/04*- Re: A question about statistics...
**Dieter Buerssner***11:03:05 01/06/04*- Re: A question about statistics...
**Peter Fendrich***16:03:58 01/06/04*- Re: A question about statistics...
**Dieter Buerssner***09:23:00 01/07/04*- Re: A question about statistics...
**Peter Fendrich***05:53:58 01/09/04*- Re: A question about statistics...
**Dieter Buerssner***10:26:17 01/09/04*- Re: A question about statistics...
**Peter Fendrich***05:05:34 01/12/04*

- Re: A question about statistics...

- Re: A question about statistics...

- Re: A question about statistics...

- Re: A question about statistics...

- Re: A question about statistics...

- Re: A question about statistics...

This page took 0.13 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.