Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 07:45:44 01/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2004 at 05:18:33, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >Hi Bob, > >>[...] >> >>My guess is that the tradeoff must between "getting at dynamic and positional >>evaluations" by the two methods. It would take some cost to do direct >>evaluation of dynamic and positional factors and that cost is what should be >>traded against the costs of the variable piece valuation approach. >> >>Agree? > >well, I think slowly thoughts an that theme will become speculative. So it would >be up to practice to show whether something would be fruitful or futile. >Evaluation - especialliy positional detail evaluation - still could be improved >a lot, as I am convinced. But it seems still open, who would have the "golden" >idea. > >Regards, Reinhard. Perhaps we need a modern-day Botvinnik to get interested in design of chess engines. : ) Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.