Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 13:29:06 01/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2004 at 13:32:51, Peter Berger wrote: >Although I don't agree with your chess analysis above, I definitely didn't mean >to imply that there is anything wrong with 4. f3 in the Nimzo-Indian. But as >Junior was able to repeat a won line again and again in this case, it probably >had some influence on the match result. ok. you don't have to agree on using f3. with chess programs it is often that moves like f3 that FORCE a certain kind of structure can be very effective WHEN THE PROGRAM THAT PLAYS IT has an idea what to do. different programs play different opening structures very good. depending on playing style. the best player cannot play strong if he does not like the opening.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.