Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 15:18:43 01/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2004 at 15:28:06, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 05, 2004 at 13:52:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 05, 2004 at 11:07:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On January 04, 2004 at 00:43:30, Ed Trice wrote: >>> >>>Hi Ed, >>> >>>It was my intention to stop posting in the amateur forum, >> >> >>Why don't you take your "non-amateur" stuff back to the forum for >>the "world's foremost authority on everything" (which has only one >>member of course, so you _never_ have to defend anything you post >>there) and leave the rest of us alone? > >I try to help him to do it. >I complained against his reply to you and I hope that he will be banned so he >will have no choice except stopping to post in this forum. > >His reply is a personal attack that has nothing to do with the subject or with >your reply. > >Uri I sincerely hope that Vincent will reconsider his false [possibly emotional] position and will apologize, I think that this would be a good sign to computerchess as a whole. I hope that the majority of all members knows that Bob Hyatt is and was always _the_ catalyst who helped many people to better understand computerchess. I think his outstanding performance as a teacher should be valued only with the most extreme admiration. And I can well add that even in cases where Bob prefered certain rare opinions we could learn a lot through his argumentation. However the allegation of fraud is absolutely over the edge and almost a crime in itself. And last but not least scientifical nonsense. That is also the reason why Vincent can't win any merits with such insults. It's very sad to watch such a social suicide. I wished you could help Vincent to realise how wrong he is. Everybody else is also cordially invited to help him out. He needs somebody. Rolf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.