Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: More about the Gothic Vortex Program, $10,000 challenge

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 15:30:32 01/05/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 05, 2004 at 18:18:57, Anthony Cozzie wrote:

>On January 05, 2004 at 13:52:39, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On January 05, 2004 at 11:07:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>On January 04, 2004 at 00:43:30, Ed Trice wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi Ed,
>>>
>>>It was my intention to stop posting in the amateur forum,
>>
>>
>>Why don't you take your "non-amateur" stuff back to the forum for
>>the "world's foremost authority on everything" (which has only one
>>member of course, so you _never_ have to defend anything you post
>>there) and leave the rest of us alone?
>>
>>your "air of superiority" is sickening, IMHO.
>>
>>BTW, exactly how many copies of your program have you sold, to qualify you
>>to be "non-amateur"???
>
>This is quite clearly an amateur forum.  The vast majority of the members here,
>including you and me, are not paid to write chess programs.
>
>I know you and Vincent don't get along, but you seem to be able to take offense
>at the mildest things when he writes them . . .
>
>anthony

 Excuse me if I contradict. IMO Bob Hyatt reacted on Vincents vocabulary with
the maximum possible friendliness as academic. I fear you underestimate the
nonsense V. is writing from time to time. Others would stop all communication
with such correspondent. In Vincent's case Bob tried to be an elderly critic
full of mild irony. While V. goes into crass verbal de-regulations. But the
limit is if you accuse unjustified a scientist of fraud. A scientist without
commercial interest in computerchess. Somewhere there must be a limit!

You can criticise all you want and a normal scientist will be happy to have a
dispute with you. But somehow you must also show some respect for the academic
education. Look, the critic of Hyatt and yours truly against the TD board in
Graz is academically sound because it's logically based on the rules and
reality. Vincent however has no case at all and he still is talking about
'fraud'.

Rolf



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.