Author: Sedat
Date: 23:49:04 01/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
>The comparison between CM9_Blitz and CM9_Gladiator shows a big difference of >12.5 points out of 70 games (half time) and a score of 60.7 % against only >42.9 %. It seems as if the Gladiator settings do not work well at the time >control 15m+10s. Under these circumstances we abstain from also testing >CM9_Gladiator in the second half of the tournament. Hi Kurt, Thanks for testing CM9 Gladiator , You are maybe right about that at 15 min+10 sec - CM9 Gladiator has bad results, Then clearly we can say for my Ratinglist that The King 3.23 SKR -do not work well at the time control: 40 moves in 40 min rest 30 min+10sec and here is the proof after 220 games: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws 1 Shredder 7.04 : 2785 37 37 240 63.3 % 2690 35.0 % 2 CM9 Gladiator : 2759 43 35 220 55.9 % 2718 35.5 % 3 Fritz 8 : 2747 44 37 200 57.5 % 2694 35.0 % 4 Hiarcs 9 : 2743 40 32 240 57.1 % 2693 40.0 % 5 Junior 8 : 2731 41 34 240 55.2 % 2694 32.9 % 6 The King 3.23 SKR : 2717 44 32 220 53.9 % 2690 40.5 % 7 Chess Tiger 15.0 : 2712 43 27 240 52.3 % 2696 47.9 % 8 Ruffian 1.0.5 : 2685 31 46 220 48.9 % 2693 39.5 % 9 Aristarch 4.21 : 2658 33 41 240 44.0 % 2700 35.4 %10 List 504 : 2657 30 41 240 43.8 % 2701 42.5 % 11 Rebel 12b9 : 2635 34 39 240 40.4 % 2702 36.7 % 12 Deep Sjeng 1.5 : 2620 41 41 200 37.8 % 2707 33.5 % 13 Gandalf 5.1 : 2615 37 36 240 35.0 % 2722 36.7 % Best, Sedat Canbaz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.