Author: Sedat
Date: 01:03:57 01/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
> Hi Sedat > Well, it's indeed strange what CM9_Gladiator demonstrated > in our "Rapid 15m+10s Tournament". We had really hoped that > all CM9-fans would now have the best overall CM9-setting > with Gladiator. On the other hand, the score of CM9_SKR > in your rating list is not much behind CM9_Gladiator > [score of 55,5 % vs 53,9 %] or in other words correspond > with the usual statistical margin error. After all the > testing with dozens of CM9-settings I do no longer believe > that it is possible to find a setting that plays successful > at all time controls. The same thing applies to our > CM9_Blitz: very strong indeed at tc 10m/g or 15m+10s but > significantly weaker at longer time controls. And as to > CM9_SKR we have only tested at 40'/40+40'/40+40' and not > with the time control used for your rating list. > http://www.utzingerkurt.com/cm9_skr_report.htm > Kurt -------------------- Hi Kurt, yes i agree with you ! That is correct that each CM9 setting can not play successful at all time controls... And each CM9 setting on different hardwares show good or bad results ! Best, Sedat
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.