Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: How long to build your chess engine

Author: martin fierz

Date: 08:20:19 01/06/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 06, 2004 at 11:03:06, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote:

>On January 06, 2004 at 10:40:57, martin fierz wrote:
>
>>On January 06, 2004 at 06:53:39, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote:
>
>>[snip]
>
>>>What I miss is a really modern (DLL based) protocol between an engine and a GUI,
>>>which consequently has a unic move encoding regardless whether normal chess,
>>>nocastle or fischerandom, additionally would be flexible to support 10x8 boards
>>>with more piece types, doing this with reduced intelligence by using engines
>>>themself as referee e.g. to decide whether moves are legal or not.
>
>>i did something like this for checkers - my winboard-inspired interface can use
>>engines which use other rules than the pre-coded american checkers (however,
>>only 8x8). in these cases it requires the engine to have an "islegal" function
>>which takes the move the user clicks on the board, and the engine tells the
>>interface whether it should accept that move or not.
>>
>>however, what you call "modern" - the dll - is not such a good idea IMO. i did
>>just that for my checkers interface, and i think the console output thing of
>>winboard/UCI is far superior. dlls are windows only. console programs run
>>everywhere. if i started doing this again, i'd use consoles now - but i guess
>>i'm stuck with the dll...
>
>there are similar technics as DLLs in Linux etc., but Linux is of no interest
>for me. Looking on the traffic statistics of my homesite:
>[http://www.rescon.de/Compu/fullchess1.html], there can be found only about 2%
>Linux and 1% Mac or Sun. Moreover Linux does not work correctly with my hardware
>and parallel installed Windows XP pro. So why should I also target other OSs
>already being here very exotic with my goals.
>
>COM moreover allows to specify events with the interface. That is, what makes
>that solution "modern". But may be, that somebody has a wonderful and better
>approach for a modern protocol. I would like to read from that then.
>
>Regards, Reinhard.

hi reinhard,

i also have site statistics :-)
but you never know, maybe one day things will change - linux is increasing in
popularity steadily, and it's much cheaper than MS windows. i don't think a
change will happen very soon, but it might happen one day...

cheers
  martin



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.