Author: Reinhard Scharnagl
Date: 10:51:29 01/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 06, 2004 at 13:24:22, Russell Reagan wrote: >On January 06, 2004 at 06:53:39, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: > >>What I miss is a really modern (DLL based) protocol between an engine and a GUI, >>which consequently has a unic move encoding regardless whether normal chess, >>nocastle or fischerandom, additionally would be flexible to support 10x8 boards >>with more piece types, doing this with reduced intelligence by using engines >>themself as referee e.g. to decide whether moves are legal or not. > >Why would you want a DLL based protocol? I can't think of a single practical >advantage for using that over a text pipe approach like Winboard or UCI, and I >can think of advantages for those text pipe approaches. This has something to do with the raising of events. Regards, Reinhard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.