Author: Reinhard Scharnagl
Date: 00:28:56 01/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2004 at 00:14:14, Russell Reagan wrote: >On January 06, 2004 at 22:05:11, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: > >>And because of that I am now talking of defining a new and more flexible >>protocol. > >I think this is where we disagree. Using "modern constructs" (which you >mistakenly confuse for "better constructs"), you do not do a single thing to >create a more "flexible protocol". However, you do create a more restrictive >protocol. To avoid this, it would be good to know, who would feel affected by that. The goal is primarily to get a working new protocol, not to go into a closed shop. The 'modern' part would be of less importance. But today being inside a niche the problem you address seems to have only a pure academic nature. Regards, Reinhard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.