Author: Ed Trice
Date: 08:10:21 01/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Michel, You might want to look here: http://www.GothicChess.org/annotated.html This has a coulple of games annotated in great detail. I also have some games "animated" that you can view as movies. One interesting one is... http://www.GothicChess.org/game4.html You could also look at some really cool "games of the month" http://www.GothicChess.org/gotm_2003_03.html http://www.GothicChess.org/gotm_2003_04.html http://www.GothicChess.org/gotm_2003_05.html http://www.GothicChess.org/gotm_2003_06.html http://www.GothicChess.org/gotm_2003_07.html http://www.GothicChess.org/gotm_2003_08.html Of course if you are a (free) member of BrainKing.com then you have access to over 2000 games played so far. http://www.BrainKing.com As for my own experience, I have found that the Chancellor combines the Rook and Knight motions less effectively that the Archbishop combines the Knight and Bishop moves. So, I tend to downgrade the value of the Chancellor (in terms of contemporary chess thinking) and upgrade the value of the Archbishop. I am one to trade my Chancellor for the opponent Archbishop if I can keep the game closed and the Archbishop's solo-checkmating power is better. Just my own opinion :) >I think the ArcBishop and Chancellor are a but stronger as you write. > >For example >- ArcBishop = Bishop + Knight + 0.15 >- Chancellor = Rook + Knight + 0.25 > >I think that a bishop is a bit stronger as in normal chess >I think that a knight is a bit weaker as in normal chess. >I think that a rook is a bit stronger as in normal chess >I think that a rook gets a bit more stronger as a bishop gets stronger in normal >chess. This because the board gets bigger on the side and not in length. > >This because all because the board is bigger. > >But I never played a game so what can I say :-) > >Michel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.