Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 11:08:38 01/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2004 at 06:33:01, F. Huber wrote: > >So this is one more example that would lead to the conclusion: >Never trust any mate announcement of a ´normal´ chess engine - >for this purpose there´s no other correct way than using a special >mate solver, and in my opinion Chest is (one of) _the best_! :) > Almost agreed, except one engine: The King. I've never seen Chessmaster 5000/5500/6000/7000/8000/9000 to announce a "Mate in X" while it is a "Mate in X+N" N>0. Of course many times it announces a "Mate in X" while it is a "Mate in X-N" N>0 but this is normal. >Best regards, >Franz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.