Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 11:34:44 01/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2004 at 14:12:46, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On January 07, 2004 at 13:28:32, Vincent Lejeune wrote:
>
>>On January 07, 2004 at 10:41:59, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On January 07, 2004 at 05:42:14, Oreopoulos Kostas wrote:
>>>
>>>> 8/5k2/3p2pp/2pPp1p1/1pP3P1/4K3/1PB5/8 w - - 0 1
[...]
>>I analysed with hiarcs 9 and a friend (>2200) (yes i was the weakest part ;) )
>>
>>And we found 1.Be4 h5 2.Bf3! and white wins
>
>I still don't see it after looking at it for 5 minutes now myself.
>
>1. Be4 h5 2. Bf3 h4.
>
>Now what?
I get:
151635372 2:46.4 0.77 25t+ 3.Kd2 Ke7 4.Kc2 Kd8 5.Kb3 Kc7 6.Bg2 Kb7 7.Be4
Ka6 8.Kc2 Kb7H 9.Kd3H Kc7H 10.Bxg6H Kd8H
11.Ke4H b3H 12.Kf3H Ke7H 13.Bd3H Ke8H 14.Be4H
Ke7H 15.Ke3H Kf6H 16.Bg2H Kf7H 17.Kd2H Ke7H
18.Kc3H h3H 19.Bxh3H Kd8H 20.Kxb3H {HT} {350}
152762379 2:47.9 0.77 25t 3.Kd2 Ke7 4.Kc2 Kd8H 5.Kb3H Kc7H 6.Bg2H Kb7H
7.Be4H Kb8H 8.Bxg6H Kc7H 9.Kc2H Kd7H 10.Kb3H
Ke7H 11.Ka4H Kd8H 12.Kb5H Kc7H 13.Be4H Kb7H
14.Bg2H Kc7H 15.Ka6H Kd7H 16.Kb6H b3H 17.Be4H
Ke7H {190}
154467629 2:50.0 0.77 25. 3.Kd2 Ke7 4.Kc2 Kd8 5.Kb3 Kc7 6.Bg2 Kb7 7.Be4
Kb8 8.Bxg6 Kc7 9.Kc2 Kd7 10.Kb3 Ke7 11.Ka4 Kd8
12.Kb5 Kc7 13.Be4 Kb7 14.Bg2 Kc7 15.Ka6 Kd7
16.Kb6 b3 17.Be4 Ke7 {190}
313339062 5:49.9 0.99 26t 3.Kd2 e4 4.Bxe4 Kf6 5.Ke2 Kf7 6.Kf2 Kf6 7.Bg2
Ke7H 8.Be4H Kf7H 9.Kg2H Kf6H 10.Bd3H Ke5H
11.Kf3H Kf6H 12.Ke4H Kf7H 13.Be2H Ke8H 14.Kf3H
Kf7H 15.Kf2H Kg7H 16.Bf3H Kf6H 17.Ke2H Ke5H
18.Ke3H Kf6H 19.Bg2H b3H 20.Bf3H Ke5H 21.Bd1H
h3H 22.Kf3H h2H 23.Kg2H h1=NH {HT}
335009064 6:13.1 1.00 26t+ 3.Be4 Kg7 4.Kd2 h3 5.Ke1 h2 6.Kf2 Kg8 7.Kg2
h1=Q+ 8.Kxh1 Kh8 9.Bxg6 e4 10.Bxe4 Kg7 11.b3
Kf6H 12.Bd3H Ke5H 13.Kg2H Kf4H 14.Kf1H Kg3H
15.Be2H Kh3H 16.Bd1H Kg3H 17.Ke2H Kh3H 18.Kf2H
Kh4H 19.Bc2H Kxg4H 20.Bd3H Kf4H 21.Be2H {HT}
{270}
347789565 6:27.4 1.08 26t 3.Be4 Kg7 4.Kd2 Kf6 5.Kd1 Kf7 6.Kc2 Ke7H 7.Kb3H
Kd7H 8.Ka4H Kc7H 9.Kb5H Kb7H 10.b3H Kc7H
11.Bxg6H Kb7H 12.Bc2H Kc7H 13.Bd3H Kc8H 14.Kc6H
h3H 15.Kxd6H Kb7H 16.Be4H Kc8H 17.Bh1H Kb7H
18.Kxe5H Ka6H 19.Be4H h2H 20.Bf3H Ka5H {HT}
{350}
349861185 6:29.7 1.08 26. 3.Be4 Kg7 4.Kd2 Kf6 5.Kd1 Kf7 6.Kc2 Ke7 7.Kb3
Kd7 8.Ka4 Kc7 9.Kb5 Kb7 10.b3 Kc7 11.Bxg6 Kb7
12.Bc2 Kc7 13.Bd3 Kc8 14.Kc6 h3 15.Kxd6 Kb7
16.Be4 Kc8 17.Bh1 Kb7 18.Kxe5 Ka6 19.Be4 h2
20.Bf3 Ka5 {HT} {350}
403650246 7:28.2 1.48 27++ 3.Be4 Kg7 4.Kd2 Kf6 5.Kc2 Ke7 6.Kb3 Kd7 7.Ka4
Kc7 8.Kb5 Kb7 9.b3 Kc7 10.Ka6 Kd8 11.Kb6 h3
12.Kc6 Kc8 13.Kxd6 Kd8 14.Kxc5 Kc8 15.d6 Kb8
16.Bxg6 {HT} {350}
534289782 9:49.8 2.46 27t 3.Be4 Kf6 4.Kd2 Ke7 5.Kc2 Kd8 6.Bxg6H b3+H
7.Kxb3H h3H 8.Ka4H e4H 9.Bxe4H Kc7H 10.Kb5H h2H
11.b4H Kd7H 12.bxc5H Kc8H 13.cxd6H h1=RH {HT}
607678988 11:07.6 2.46 27. 3.Be4 Kf6 4.Kd2 Ke7 5.Kc2 Kd8 6.Bxg6 b3+ 7.Kxb3
h3 8.Ka4 e4 9.Bxe4 Kc7 10.Kb5 h2 11.b4 Kd7
12.bxc5 Kc8 13.cxd6 h1=R
Certainly not a score, that is totally convincing yet. But when I follow the PV,
I get winning score, and mate score soon. Note, much of the PVs can be garbage
(the moves which have "H" attached are fetched from HTs at display time, and may
well have been overwritten since search time). Nevertheless, it [the PV] does
not look too bad. We see the march of the K over to the Q side.
Regards,
Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.