Author: Ed Trice
Date: 23:37:25 01/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hello Slater, > >Your patent is not valid. Plain and simple. > >Tomorrow, under Section 302 of 35 U.S.C., I will be asking the USPTO to >reexamine your patent, with more than enough proof to sustain that you do not >'own' the variant, nor the method. I still find it disgusting that you quote >Capablanca in your Backgroud, yet give no mention of his ideas on changing the >game. > Download the full text of the patent and read all of the acknowledgements that I gave to Capablanca. The patent is valid. It was presented by Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius, the 4th largest law firm in the United States, by a patent agent who was a decent chess player and someone well versed in the patent process. It was transferred to Drinker, Biddle, & Reath, the 2nd largest firm in Philadelphia, to handle for review for International Patenting. Tomorrow under Section 413 of 42 U.S.C., I will fart in your general direction and hope it smells bad. > >Let me make a few suggestions to you, Mr. Trice: > >#1. Return the money to those who you have licensed Gothic Chess to. No. >#2. Let people ENJOY Gothic Chess, and help it flourish, without monetary >involvment or threats of litigation. People do enjoy Gothic Chess. It is flourishing. What threats? >#3. Turn your message logger off. No. >#4. Fire your lawyer. No. >#5. Call your lawyer back, and fire him again. No. Anything else? :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.