Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation: Defamatory post.

Author: Ed Trice

Date: 09:41:21 01/08/04

Go up one level in this thread


Hello Christophe,

>
>You should not rest on this.
>
>The fact that there is a patent does *not* mean that it is valid.
>
>It is a known fact that the US office of patents has stopped long ago to check
>anything in the patents they grant.
>
>You ask for a patent, they give it to you. They don't check anything.

Umm...no. The patent received an initial rejection, called a 102 or 103
rejection, I forget which.

It is said they flat out reject 90% of the patents just for the hell of it.

They cited Gollon from 1977 showing an 80 square board (Capablanca's) then I had
to prove mine to be unique.

I am not sure where you get your misinformation, did you just make that up?

:)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.