Author: Slater Wold
Date: 09:51:21 01/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2004 at 12:41:21, Ed Trice wrote: >Hello Christophe, > >> >>You should not rest on this. >> >>The fact that there is a patent does *not* mean that it is valid. >> >>It is a known fact that the US office of patents has stopped long ago to check >>anything in the patents they grant. >> >>You ask for a patent, they give it to you. They don't check anything. > >Umm...no. The patent received an initial rejection, called a 102 or 103 >rejection, I forget which. > >It is said they flat out reject 90% of the patents just for the hell of it. > >They cited Gollon from 1977 showing an 80 square board (Capablanca's) then I had >to prove mine to be unique. And how is it unique? You call it 'Gothic' and renamed your 'plurality of chess pieces'? Oh, that's right, Capa named one of yours, so you only had to come up with one unique name! Your not original, and neither is your game. >I am not sure where you get your misinformation, did you just make that up? Yes, he did. Unlike yourself, he can make up something 'new'. >:)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.