Author: Slater Wold
Date: 09:59:36 01/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2004 at 12:55:19, Steve Maughan wrote: >Christophe, > >[snip] >>...And you would lose and have to pay for all the legal fees. > >This is the case under British law but, as I understand it, it's not the case >for US law where everyone pays their own costs. On this one I prefer the >British system. The US system seems to have the dynamic that if you have money >you can bully other since they will need to find cash to defend themselves. >Maybe this is the reason why there are so many lawyers in the US (~10% of my >phone book is 'Lawyers') > >Steve That would not be the case here. I have directly given cause to Mr. Trice why his patent is not valid. He knows his patent is not valid. If his comprehension skills are so poor, that he cannot understand why his patent is not valid, that's his problem, not anyone elses. If he were to file a lawsuit against ANYONE, for patent infringement, all the defendant would have to do is show this information, and when the judge threw out the case because obviously the patent doesn't hold water, Mr. Trice would be responsible for the legal fees of the defendant because it was a 'frivilous' lawsuit. In other words, he knew his patent was crap, he had been shown why his patent was crap, and yet he continued to waste others time and money claiming it was not crap.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.