Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: How to beat Gothmog

Author: Drexel,Michael

Date: 10:30:23 01/08/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 08, 2004 at 12:01:56, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On January 08, 2004 at 10:02:39, Anthony Cozzie wrote:
>
>>I've been trying to get some good test positions to rewrite my kingsafety with,
>>and playing Gothmog will give you those :) Usually Zappa is slightly better than
>>Gothmog.  It is stronger tactically (gets more nps and does not do all dubious
>>forward pruning) and its mobility is good enough that it plays reasonable moves
>>most of the time.  Usually Zappa will get its wins in the endgame, but Gothmog
>>will get in enough king attacks that the score is close.  During one of the test
>>games, this position came up (Zappa-white, Gothmog-black):
>>
>>[D]r2qk2r/pb4pp/3bn3/1P1ppp2/8/BQP5/P2NBPPP/R4RK1 b kq - 4 17
>>
>>Where Gothmog evaluated itself as +1, and Zappa thought it was about equal -
>>which is of course ludicrous since black has a big advantage. I was less than
>>happy with Zappa being blown off the board in 20 moves and not even realizing
>>it, so I wrote some code to evaluate control of the board.  But I made a mistake
>>and tuned it way too high.
>>
>>What was amazing was the result.  Every game went like this:
>>
>>Zappa pushes pawns
>>Gothmog sacrifices a piece for the pawns
>>Gothmog thinks its down .5
>>Zappa thinks its up 2
>>Zappa wins back pawns and the game with its extra piece/exchange
>>
>>Result: Zappa scores 86% - +18-0=7.
>>
>>Moral of the story: If you want to beat Gothmog, triple your space evaluation.
>>
>>anthony
>>
>>caveat: This was done under Arena, with the arena books, which need a bit of
>>work.
>
>Another moral:  Don't trade a piece for 2-3 pawns.  It will come back to
>haunt you more than it doesn't.

It depends. In the late endgame it is usually advisable to trade a piece for 3
pawns.

[D] 8/7R/6p1/4Kpk1/p1B5/8/8/4r3 w - - 0 63

Crafty was happy with this hopeless position and got a lesson in the game:

Crafty 19.06 - Hiarcs 9
8/7R/6p1/4Kpk1/p1B5/8/8/4r3 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Crafty 19.06:

63.Kd6 f4 64.Bd5 a3 65.Rg7 Kf5 66.Rf7+ Kg4 67.Rg7
  =  (-0.22)   Depth: 8   00:00:00  109kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Bd3 a3 65.Ra7 Ra1 66.Ra5+ Kg4 67.Bxg6
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 8   00:00:00  177kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Bd3 a3 65.Ra7 Ra1 66.Ra5+ Kg4 67.Bxg6
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 8   00:00:00  178kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Bd5 a3 65.Rh3 Re3 66.Rxe3 fxe3 67.Kxe3 Kf5
  =  (-0.01)   Depth: 9   00:00:00  312kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Bd5 a3 65.Rh3 Re3 66.Rxe3 fxe3 67.Kxe3 Kf5
  =  (-0.01)   Depth: 9   00:00:00  379kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Rg7 f3 65.Rf7 Kg4 66.Bd5 Rf1 67.Be4 g5
  =  (-0.06)   Depth: 10   00:00:01  1025kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Rg7 f3 65.Rf7 Kg4 66.Bd5 Rf1 67.Be4 g5
  =  (-0.06)   Depth: 10   00:00:02  1181kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Rg7 f3 65.Bd3 Re6 66.Rf7 Rf6 67.Rxf6 Kxf6 68.Ke3 a3 69.Kxf3
  =  (-0.11)   Depth: 11   00:00:04  2652kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Rg7 f3 65.Bd3 Re6 66.Rf7 Rf6 67.Rxf6 Kxf6 68.Ke3 a3 69.Kxf3
  =  (-0.11)   Depth: 11   00:00:05  3132kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Bd5 Kg4 65.Be4 a3 66.Rh2 g5 67.Rg2+ Kh4 68.Rh2+ Kg3 69.Rg2+ Kh4
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 12   00:00:17  9699kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Bd5 Kg4 65.Be4 a3 66.Rh2 g5 67.Rg2+ Kh4 68.Rh2+ Kg3 69.Rg2+ Kh4
  =  (0.00)   Depth: 12   00:00:18  10240kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Bd5 Kg4 65.Ra7 g5 66.Be4 Rd1+ 67.Ke5 f3 68.Rf7 Rf1 69.Ra7 Kg3
70.Rxa4
  =  (-0.20)   Depth: 13   00:00:31  17255kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Bd5 Kg4 65.Ra7 g5 66.Be4 Rd1+ 67.Ke5 f3 68.Rf7 Rf1 69.Ra7 Kg3
70.Rxa4
  =  (-0.20)   Depth: 13   00:00:42  23499kN
63.Kd4 f4 64.Bd5 Kg4 65.Ra7 g5 66.Bc6 Rc1 67.Bd5 f3 68.Rf7 Rd1+ 69.Ke4 Rf1
70.Ke5
  =  (-0.14)   Depth: 14   00:01:28  48402kN

[Event ""]
[Site ""]
[Date "2003.11.27"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Crafty 19.06"]
[Black "Hiarcs 9"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B92"]
[Annotator "0.56;0.65"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "8/7R/6p1/4Kpk1/p1B5/8/8/r7 b - - 0 62"]
[PlyCount "43"]
[TimeControl "300+3"]

62... Re1+ {(f4) -1.59/12 5} 63. Kd4 {-0.15/12 5} f4 {-1.51/11 6} 64. Bd5 {
-0.20/11 6} Kg4 {-1.53/11 4} 65. Rh6 {(Rh2) -0.36/11 5} g5 {(Kf5) -1.84/10 3}
66. Be6+ {(Rh2) -0.19/11 5} Kf3 {-1.84/11 6} 67. Rh3+ {(Bd5+) -0.19/11 7} Kf2 {
-1.92/11 5} 68. Bf5 {-0.36/11 5} Rg1 {-1.84/10 5} 69. Ke4 {-0.35/11 11} Rg3 {
-1.84/11 4} 70. Rh2+ {-0.70/11 5} Kg1 {-1.84/11 4} 71. Ra2 {-0.31/12 5} f3 {
(Re3+) -1.97/11 4} 72. Ra1+ {-1.42/11 5} Kg2 {-2.13/12 4} 73. Bd7 {
(Ke3) -1.52/12 5} f2 {-2.51/11 4} 74. Bb5 {-1.48/12 5} Rf3 {-2.38/11 5} 75.
Bf1+ {-1.64/12 4} Kg3 {-2.59/12 4} 76. Be2 {-1.72/12 4} Rf4+ {(Rf8) -2.75/11 3}
77. Ke3 {(Kd3) -2.11/12 4} g4 {-2.85/11 4} 78. Bf1 {-2.35/12 5} Rf3+ {
-3.43/11 4} 79. Ke2 {-2.91/12 5} a3 {-3.63/12 4} 80. Rd1 {(Kd2) -3.40/12 4} Rb3
{-5.44/11 3} 81. Ra1 {-7.73/12 5} Rb2+ {-10.40/11 3} 82. Ke3 {(Kd3) -10.95/13 4
} a2 {-11.05/11 4} 83. Ke4 {-12.54/13 7} Rb1 {-12.86/12 4} 0-1

Michael



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.