Author: Ed Trice
Date: 10:41:06 01/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
> >I have directly given cause to Mr. Trice why his patent is not valid. He knows >his patent is not valid. If his comprehension skills are so poor, that he >cannot understand why his patent is not valid, that's his problem, not anyone >elses. > >If he were to file a lawsuit against ANYONE, for patent infringement, all the >defendant would have to do is show this information, and when the judge threw >out the case because obviously the patent doesn't hold water, Mr. Trice would be >responsible for the legal fees of the defendant because it was a 'frivilous' >lawsuit. > >In other words, he knew his patent was crap, he had been shown why his patent >was crap, and yet he continued to waste others time and money claiming it was >not crap. I have already won one case. Do some reasearch. It was a very short trial. What you said about paying for the defendants's fees is fiction.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.