Author: Slater Wold
Date: 12:32:28 01/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2004 at 15:12:17, Keith Evans wrote: >On January 08, 2004 at 01:48:21, Slater Wold wrote: > >>Tomorrow, under Section 302 of 35 U.S.C., I will be asking the USPTO to >>reexamine your patent, with more than enough proof to sustain that you do not >>'own' the variant, nor the method. I still find it disgusting that you quote >>Capablanca in your Backgroud, yet give no mention of his ideas on changing the >>game. > >Slate, > >What would be your motivation to do this? To get Ed off his high horse... Someone says something about a board, and he has to 'consult with his lawyers'. His claims are all crap. And it just annoyed me to the point of action. >If you busted the patent would you then do a bunch of work on Gothic chess? No. But others might. And they wouldn't have to pay Mr. Trice a cent. There's my motivation... >If not then why bother? Just the kind of person I am, I guess. I think TJF called me a 'meddler'. >There are many dubious patents granted, so why spend the time to attempt to >bust this particular patent? Because of the gospel he's preaching around here. Perhaps after this, I'll work on something more 'obviously beneficial' to myself. :)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.