Author: José Carlos
Date: 06:34:16 01/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2004 at 07:09:17, F. Huber wrote: >On January 09, 2004 at 06:39:19, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On January 08, 2004 at 18:06:15, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On January 08, 2004 at 17:57:58, Tom Likens wrote: >>> >>>>On January 08, 2004 at 12:51:06, José Carlos wrote: >>>> >>>>> Having a look at the search engine I found a post about Rexchess. I recall it >>>>>searching really deep in my old 286. And I mean deep, like 9 or 10 plies. Is >>>>>there any documentation about its search techniques anywhere? It's old and >>>>>problably its search is really outdated, so maybe its secrets are public... >>>>> >>>>> José C. >>>> >>>>Jose, >>>> >>>>Do a search on messages posted by "Don Dailey". >>>> >>>>regards, >>>>--tom >>> >>>Found a page about it. In Czech, though. >>>http://www.multiweb.cz/max.rubin/rex230.htm >> >> >>the problem with older versions of rexchess on fast machines is that >>the benchmark it starts at the beginning is causing a crash of the program. >>on today's machine the loop is done too fast and the machine gets a division by >>sero. > >What do you mean by ´older versions´ - I´ve never heared about newer ones!? > >But I´ve patched exacatly this benchmark code in the program to run also >on fast computers of today. Since now RexChess is being available for free, >I think it would be no problem to give away my patched version. (?) >(So if somebody wants it ..... ;-)) > >Regards, >Franz. Since I agree that it should not be a problem frim a legal point of view, could you please send me your patched version? I love that old jewel... José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.