Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 17:01:39 01/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2004 at 19:53:52, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >On January 09, 2004 at 19:43:05, Brack Nickrow wrote: > >>My thoughts exactly, I may be a purist but i'm against the promotion of >>alterations to the royal game! No human has ever mastered the game totally, not >>even Kasparov and no one ever will. There is no reason to alter it. Growth >>smoth it's destruction! Here should be no different than Frances body that >>tries to protect their language from being corrupted. Protect Chess. Out with >>variants they are for another forum! and yes yes this definitely includes FRC! > >Which words will count here? Your's unfounded or those competent from the former >(?) world chess champion Robert Fischer? > >How do you get the idea, that someone will take away your traditional chess? >Overmore, if you are convinced in that classic variant, lay back and watch which >other way to play chess will stay or vanish. > >Your claim to protect chess could be understood as an outing it as a dying >species. Is that what you intend? Think it over! > >Regards, Reinhard. As long as Kasparov and Chessbase can get rich from Chess, it will remain. : ) Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.