Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A second question ... Tablebases!

Author: Lars Bremer

Date: 08:30:52 01/10/04

Go up one level in this thread


Hi,

>I have to buy a new OS :-((

Win2k does support HT. It handles HT as two different physical processors. WinXP
can handle these virtual processors.

>The biggest wish is a good Service Pack for Windows NT4 (SP7) with USB, >Directx9
>and Hyperthreading support! That's all :-)

It exists and is called Windows XP

>BTW:
>Bob do you think that SCSI is better as S-ATA (interesting for me if I used on
>two harddisk 5-pieces for engine-engine matches with ponder = on on dual Xeon.
>After my first test it seems that S-ATA is just great for tablebases.

Lol, SATA-drives are exactly the same as PATA-drives, there are no differences.
I count them twice, believe me.
Normally there is only a special chip at the drive's board to convert parallel
to serial.

If you want to know which kind of drive is better to store and use tablebases,
you should read CSS 4/03, where I compared some different hard drives under this
point of view.
15k-SCSI was the best, but it was not as fast as one could think, and modern
ATA-drives are very fast too.

ciao

Lars



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.