Author: stuart taylor
Date: 17:50:10 01/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2004 at 09:58:03, Stephen Ham wrote: >"snipped" > > >>Might it be possible that the next Hiarcs could be a breakthrough in computer >>chess level, from what you can guess (based on your understanding)? I'm talking >>about long timings too. >>Or is it that Shredder etc. is the REAL monster when given time? (and Hiarcs >>might just be optimized for blitz, but improves evaluation very slowly after >>more time, by which time Shredder catches up and overtakes)? >>S.Taylor > >Dear Stuart, > >Thanks for thinking I might know the answer to this. However, I confess that I'm >the least knowledgeable poster at this web site, with respect to computer chess. >So all I can do is report results and leave it to you experts to interpret. > >I do have good news though. I've exchanged a couple emails with Mark Uniacke and >he said Hiarc 10 is in the works. I offered to provide some assistance with the >opening book in that I'm reporting obvious flaws in the book when I discover >them. > >Mark's a very nice guy. He's aware that the H9 book (and previous books) are >less than ideal and he plans to improve the situation. > >All the best, > >Stephen It sounds like if he takes your help, it will indeed help the program alot! S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.