Author: Reinhard Scharnagl
Date: 02:04:31 01/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2004 at 02:00:48, Ed Trice wrote: >I know Reinhardt has been waiting for the results of Gothic Vortex using his >values versus the Strategically Folded values currently in Gothic Vortex. > >Here is GV vs. GV Reinhardt so far, played at 1 minute per move on a 2 GHz >Pentium IV. > >Sorry for no PGN, it has been a looooong game! > >Interesting to note is that Vortex allowed its Chancellor to be won for >Reinhardt's Archbishop at move 19/20. Reinhardt had a +100-120 score for a long >time, Vortex thought it was up +15. Gradually over the next 30 moves, >Reinhardt's score came down and eventually became about -50, whereas the Vortex >score steadily climbed to about +160. > >Most of the game is a duel between the White Archbishop and Black's Rook and >Knight. The Archbishop picked off two pawns, leaving the position adjourned at >Arch + 5 pawns vs. R + N + 3 pawns. [...] Hello Ed, thank you for testing! I think, the average piece exchange values have less importance as the game develops and the positional detail evaluation becomes more important. The more precise the latter would be, the more the influence of average piece values will vanish. Or - the other side - the simpler a written chess program is, the more those exchange values will have importance. Therefore it would be not bad to know, which values will match best, and that could be figures different from yours and mine. Regards, Reinhard,
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.