Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 14:34:34 01/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2004 at 17:03:46, Tord Romstad wrote: >On January 11, 2004 at 16:45:16, martin fierz wrote: > >>On January 11, 2004 at 15:45:54, Tord Romstad wrote: >> >>>That's not bad at all! I haven't tested against Crafty for a long time, but I'm >>>fairly sure >>>Gothmog is at least 250 points behind Crafty on a single-processor 32 bit >>>machine. >> >>hi tord, >> >>i'll bet you a beer that it's less than that! > >Hi Martin, > >I accept your bet, and I am willing to bet that the opposite is true. If some >neutral person >is willing to run a 100-game blitz match between Gothmog 0.4.5 and the most >recent version >of Crafty on a single-processor 32 bit machine, and Crafty scores less than 81 >points, I'll >buy you a beer if we ever meet. :-) > >If you ever come to Norway, please be warned that the beer is ridiculously >expensive here. > >Tord A 40 games blitz match Gothmog 0.45-Crafty 19.06 (Dann Corbit) ended 16,5:23,5 (+12 =9 -19) Gothmog without tablebase support since it does not work if the tablebases are located on a different harddisk. timecontrol 3 min without increment; AMD 1.6Ghz; CB-GUI; Fritz8.ctg book, both engines have to play each position with black and white; 64 MB hash; 3,4,5 men tablebases for Crafty In a second Blitz match on AMD 1.8 Ghz Gothmog has tablebase support. The results are clearly worse nevertheless. 18:8 in favour of Crafty 19.06; time control is 5 min + 3 sec Crafty 19.06 DC performed much better than Crafty 19.08 DC in Blitz on my machines, so I will continue to use it. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.