Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 19:54:41 01/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2004 at 13:04:30, Slater Wold wrote: >On January 11, 2004 at 10:22:44, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>On January 11, 2004 at 03:38:10, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>[D]4n3/pp5p/6k1/2P2pp1/5p2/2B2P2/PPK3PP/8 w >>> >>>Be5!! >> >>I think the problem is that Kd3 wins just as easily for white ..also note your >>pv - second move Be5! > >Kd3 does not. > >>> 14-> 1:36 0.90 1. Kd3 Kf7 2. h4 h6 3. Be5 Nf6 4. Kd4 >>> Nd7 5. Bc7 Kf6 6. hxg5+ hxg5 7. Bd8+ >>> Kg6 8. a4 Nf6 9. Be7 (s=5) > >This is NOT winning. > >>> 15 2:12 1.07 1. Kd3 Kf7 2. Be5 Ke6 3. Kd4 a5 4. >>> a4 h6 5. g3 fxg3 6. Bxg3 Nf6 7. Be1 >>> g4 8. fxg4 Nxg4 9. Bxa5 Nxh2 (s=4) > >Correct, it found Be5, which is acceptable. But it took 2:12! is that bad? ....I though that was good... > >>>? 15 3:08 9/24* 1. Ba5 >>>White(1): ? >>> time=3:09 cpu=198% mat=0 n=240464164 fh=92% nps=1.27M >>> ext-> chk=4311346 cap=1282008 pp=2029674 1rep=80813 mate=264 >>> predicted=0 nodes=240464164 evals=96673468 >>> endgame tablebase-> probes=0 hits=0 >>> SMP-> split=1226 stop=130 data=7/4096 cpu=6:17 elap=3:09 I think Kd3 may lead to a win ...should we play this out?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.