Author: José Carlos
Date: 23:43:44 01/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2004 at 16:51:40, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 11, 2004 at 16:07:32, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On January 11, 2004 at 05:43:04, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>[D]r1r3k1/4bp1p/1qp1b1p1/1p1n4/3PB3/P5N1/1BQ2PPP/R3R1K1 w - - 0 21 >>> >>>In this position Ruffian plays almost instantly Bxg6. Is this real sacrifice? >>>Is it correct? Actually Ruffian lost this game against Fritz... >>> >>>Jouni >>> >>>PS: I hope, that next Ruffian update gives the missing 70 points from promised >>>100 over 1.0.1 :-) >> >>Hi Jouni, >> >>Ruffian 1.0.5 is around 20-30 ELO stronger with longer time controls (not with >>blitz time controls). Ruffian 2.0.0 is clear stronger as Ruffian 1.0.5. >> >>The main questions is the time controls! >> >>I test the engine under Arena Chess GUI with 40 moves in 10 minutes and get >>every time the same results. >> >>Best >>Frank > >I do not know but at least in WBEC I do not see strong performance of Ruffian2 >and 40/40 time control is used there. > >It is now only third place. >3.5 points after Deep sjeng. >Chances to win the premier division seem to be very small. > >Ruffian 1.0.5 scored 55.5/84 one point behind Deep sjeng1.5 >Ruffian2.0 has 35/56 and is 3.5 points behind Deep Sjeng1.5 > >Uri If you want Ruffian 2 to be "the strongest winboard engine on earth" you also must buy Frank's computer and use only 40/10. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.