Author: Matthias Gemuh
Date: 04:05:49 01/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2004 at 04:56:13, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >On January 12, 2004 at 00:55:18, Paul Doire wrote: > >> Has everyone found using the UCI import in Fritz 8 to be much better than the >>old winboard chessbase adapter. Is it safe to say UCI engines will run just as >>strongly in Fritz 8 Gui as they do in say the Arena Gui....another words no >>appreciable loss of strength. >> >>Is the Chessbase Gui "the place" to run matches now without the heavy prejudice >>the old winboard adapter had towards chessbase products? Is it neutral? >> >>Thanks >>Paul > >I do all of my testing in the Chessbase GUI via UCI and haven't run into any >problems. The one criticism I have is that there is no way to run good >handicapped matches. The only thing you can do is give Shredder "9 ply" and your >engine "10" but it's a bit unrealistic, sometimes the time advantage is 5:1, >sometimes 2:1. > >The main advantages of ChessBase vs Arena are better opening books and most >importantly you immediately have the games in ChessBase format for inspection >and analysis, nothing compares to ChessBase in this area IMO. > >Vas Can you intercept and see the UCI commands that ChessBase sends to engines ? If you are an engine author, you can log all the communication, of course. In the command "setoption name Hash value X", ChessBase randomly sets X=1, instead of X="Hash size in MB".
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.