Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The "Correct Assessment" of a Chess Position

Author: jefkaan

Date: 09:20:36 01/12/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 11, 2004 at 14:57:15, Ed Trice wrote:
>
>Material is still the dominant force in every evaluation,

apparently you've never heard of passed pawns,
gambits, centre dominance, and things like that.
The factor 'Material' contains a big inaccuracy;
at least of one pawn, sometimes more.
We all know chess programs are not good
in planning& strategy; the difficulty
imho is how to translate GM 'intuition'
into concrete algorithms (without
wasting too much computing time),
best regards,
jef




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.