Author: Chessfun
Date: 11:18:39 01/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2004 at 14:16:55, Chessfun wrote: >On January 12, 2004 at 14:13:03, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > >>On January 12, 2004 at 13:30:12, Chessfun wrote: >> >> >>> >>>There is a difference between understanding the problem and having a problem. >>>I don't see there is a problem if the log files are checked at least not in >>> >> >> >>I think I should clarify you on this issue. >>An engine will set some unrevealed hash size (or better, value defined in cfg) >>when initializing. >>When UCI game starts, the engine _has_to_ to give up its predefined hash size, >>and switch to the value recommended by UCI GUI. >>Well-behaved Ruffian _does_not_ switch back to cfg value !!! >>Use a tool that displays memory usage at runtime and your eyes shall open wide. >>Note that you may have to peep into memory usage of several non-first-round >>games to see the fraud. > >I'll give it a try especially as my other PC is at 125/140 games at 60'. > >Sarah. Though in XP Windows task manager shows it as fine 138,732 currently playing Deep Sjeng showing 138,684 Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.